4.7 Article

Fragmenting protostellar discs: properties and observational signatures

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 433, Issue 4, Pages 3256-3273

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt970

Keywords

accretion; accretion discs; hydrodynamics; instabilities; stars: formation

Funding

  1. RFBR [11-02-92601-KO]
  2. OeAD-Austrian Agency for International Cooperation in Education Research
  3. Scholarship Foundation of the Republic of Austria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using numerical hydrodynamic simulations, we study the gravitational fragmentation of an unstable protostellar disc formed during the collapse of a pre-stellar core with a mass of 1.2 M-circle dot. The forming fragments span a mass range from about a Jupiter mass to very low mass protostars and are located at distances from a few tens to a thousand au, with a dearth of objects at less than or similar to 100 au. We explore the possibility of observational detection of the fragments in discs viewed through the outflow cavity at a distance of 250 pc. We demonstrate that one hour of integration time with the Atacama Large Millimeter/sub-millimeter Array (ALMA) is sufficient to detect the fragments with masses as low as 1.5M(Jup) at orbital distances up to 800 au from the protostar. The ALMA resolution sets the limit on the minimum orbital distance of detectable fragments. For the adopted resolution of our simulated ALMA images of 0.1 arcsec, the fragments can be detected at distances down to 50 au. At smaller distances, the fragments usually merge with the central density peak. The likelihood for detecting the fragments reduces significantly for a lower resolution of 0.5 arcsec. Some of the most massive fragments, regardless of their orbital distance, can produce characteristic peaks at approximate to 5 mu m and hence their presence can be indirectly inferred from the observed spectral energy distributions of protostars.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available