4.7 Article

Inverse Compton X-ray signature of AGN feedback

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 436, Issue 3, Pages 2346-2351

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1739

Keywords

galaxies: active; galaxies: evolution; quasars: general; X-rays: galaxies

Funding

  1. STFC grant
  2. STFC research studentship
  3. STFC [ST/H002235/1, PP/E00119X/1, ST/H00856X/1, ST/K502121/1, ST/K001000/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K502121/1, PP/E00119X/1, ST/K001000/1, ST/H002235/1, ST/H00856X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bright AGN frequently show ultrafast outflows (UFOs) with outflow velocities v(out) similar to 0.1c. These outflows may be the source of AGN feedback on their host galaxies sought by galaxy formation modellers. The exact effect of the outflows on the ambient galaxy gas strongly depends on whether the shocked UFOs cool rapidly or not. This in turn depends on whether the shocked electrons share the same temperature as ions (one-temperature regime, 1T) or decouple (2T), as has been recently suggested. Here we calculate the inverse Compton spectrum emitted by such shocks, finding a broad feature potentially detectable either in mid-to-high energy X-rays (1T case) or only in the soft X-rays (2T). We argue that current observations of AGN do not seem to show evidence for the 1T component. The limits on the 2T emission are far weaker, and in fact it is possible that the observed soft X-ray excess of AGN is partially or fully due to the 2T shock emission. This suggests that UFOs are in the energy-driven regime outside the central few pc, and must pump considerable amounts of not only momentum but also energy into the ambient gas. We encourage X-ray observers to look for the inverse Compton components calculated here in order to constrain AGN feedback models further.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available