4.7 Article

Light curve and spectral evolution of the Type IIb supernova 2011fu

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 431, Issue 1, Pages 308-321

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt162

Keywords

supernovae: general; supernovae: individual: SN 2011fu; supernovae: individual (SN 1993J); galaxies: individual (UGC 01626)

Funding

  1. Indo-Russian (DST-RFBR) [INT/RFBR/P-100]
  2. RFBR [11-02-12696-IND-a]
  3. Department of Physical Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences [17]
  4. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [14.B37.21.0251, 14.A18.21.1179]
  5. Hungarian OTKA [K76816]
  6. Actions de Recherche Concertees (ARC)
  7. National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the low-resolution spectroscopic and UBVRI broad-band photometric investigations of the Type IIb supernova (SN) 2011fu, discovered in UGC 01626. The photometric follow-up of this event was initiated a few days after the explosion and covers a period of about 175 d. The early-phase light curve shows a rise, followed by steep decay in all bands, and shares properties very similar to that seen for SN 1993J, with a possible detection of the adiabatic cooling phase. Modelling of the quasi-bolometric light curve suggests that the progenitor had an extended (similar to 1 x 10(13) cm), low-mass (similar to 0.1 M-circle dot) H-rich envelope on top of a dense, compact (similar to 2 x 10(11) cm), more massive (similar to 1.1 M-circle dot) He-rich core. The nickel mass synthesized during the explosion was found to be similar to 0.21 M-circle dot, slightly larger than that seen for other Type IIb SNe. The spectral modelling performed with SYNOW suggests that the early-phase line velocities for H and Fe II features were similar to 16 000 and similar to 14 000 km s(-1), respectively. Then, the velocities declined up to day +40 and became nearly constant at later epochs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available