4.7 Article

Simulations of the merging galaxy cluster Abell 3376

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 430, Issue 4, Pages 3249-3260

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt127

Keywords

methods: numerical; galaxies: clusters: individual: A3376; galaxies: clusters: intracluster medium

Funding

  1. Brazilian agency FAPESP [2009/54006-4]
  2. FAPESP [2010/12277-9]
  3. CAPES/COFECUB cooperation
  4. CNPq
  5. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [10/12277-9, 09/54006-4] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Observed galaxy clusters often exhibit X-ray morphologies suggestive of recent interaction with an infalling subcluster. A3376 is a nearby (z = 0.046) massive galaxy cluster whose bullet-shaped X-ray emission indicates that it may have undergone a recent collision. It displays a pair of Mpc-scale radio relics and its brightest cluster galaxy is located 970 h(70)(-1) kpc away from the peak of X-ray emission, where the second brightest galaxy lies. We attempt to recover the dynamical history of A3376. We perform a set of N-body adiabatic hydrodynamical simulations using the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) code GADGET-2. These simulations of binary cluster collisions are aimed at exploring the parameter space of possible initial configurations. By attempting to match X-ray morphology, temperature, virial mass and X-ray luminosity, we set approximate constraints on some merger parameters. Our best models suggest a collision of clusters with mass ratio in the range 1/6-1/8, and having a subcluster with central gas density four times higher than that of the major cluster. Models with small impact parameter (b < 150 kpc), if any, are preferred. We estimate that A3376 is observed approximately 0.5 Gyr after core passage, and that the collision axis is inclined by i approximate to 40 degrees with respect to the plane of the sky. The infalling subcluster drives a supersonic shock wave that propagates at almost 2600 km s(-1), implying a Mach number as high as M similar to 4; but we show how it would have been underestimated as M similar to 3 due to projection effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available