4.7 Article

A measurement of galaxy halo mass from the surrounding H i Lyα absorption

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 433, Issue 4, Pages 3103-3114

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt950

Keywords

galaxies: high-redshift; intergalactic medium; quasars: absorption lines

Funding

  1. STFC
  2. Large Facilities Capital Fund of BIS
  3. Durham University
  4. National Computing Facilities Foundation (NCF)
  5. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  6. VIDI grant
  7. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme/ERC [278594-GasAroundGalaxies]
  8. Marie Curie Training Network CosmoComp [PITN-GA-2009-238356]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We measure the dark matter halo masses of << z >> approximate to 2.36 UV colour-selected star-forming galaxies by matching the observed median H i Ly alpha absorption around them, as observed in the spectra of background QSOs, to the absorption around haloes above a given mass in cosmological simulations. Focusing on transverse separations 0-2 proper Mpc (pMpc) and line-of-sight separations 154-616 km s(-1), we find a minimum halo mass of log(10)M(min)/M-circle dot = 11.6 +/- 0.2, which is in good agreement with published halo mass estimates from clustering analyses. We verified that the measured halo mass is insensitive to a change in the cosmological parameters (Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe 1 versus Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe 3) and to the inclusion of strong AGN feedback. One unique strength of this method is that it can be used in narrow field galaxy-QSO surveys, i.e. approximate to 30 x 30 arcsec. In addition, we find that the observed anisotropy in the 2D H i Ly alpha absorption distribution on scales of 1.5-2 pMpc is consistent with being a consequence of large-scale gas infall into the potential wells occupied by galaxies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available