4.7 Article

The baryon budget on the galaxy group/cluster boundary

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 429, Issue 4, Pages 3288-3304

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sts586

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: stellar content; cosmology: observations; X-rays: galaxies: clusters

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
  2. EU Marie Curie fellowship
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1108957] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a study of the hot gas and stellar content of five optically selected poor galaxy clusters, including a full accounting of the contribution from intracluster light (ICL) and a combined hot gas and hydrostatic X-ray mass analysis with XMM-Newton observations. We find weighted mean stellar (including ICL), gas and total baryon mass fractions within r(500) of 0.026 +/- 0.003, 0.070 +/- 0.005 and 0.096 +/- 0.006, respectively, at a corresponding weighted mean M-500 of (1.08(-0.18)(+0.21)) x 10(14) M-circle dot. Even when accounting for the intracluster stars, four out of five clusters show evidence for a substantial baryon deficit within r(500), with baryon fractions (f(b)) between 50 +/- 6 and 59 +/- 8 per cent of the universal mean level (i.e. Omega(b)/Omega(m)), the remaining cluster having f(b) = 75 +/- 11 per cent. For the three clusters where we can trace the hot halo to r(500) we find no evidence for a steepening of the gas density profile in the outskirts with respect to a power law, as seen in more massive clusters. We find that in all cases, the X-ray mass measurements are larger than those originally published on the basis of the galaxy velocity dispersion (sigma) and an assumed sigma-M-500 relation, by a factor of 1.7-5.7. Despite these increased masses, the stellar fractions (in the range 0.016-0.034, within r(500)) remain consistent with the trend with mass published by Gonzalez et al., from which our sample is drawn.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available