4.7 Article

The impact of systematic uncertainties in N-body simulations on the precision cosmology from galaxy clustering: a halo model approach

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 434, Issue 3, Pages 2556-2571

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1200

Keywords

cosmological parameters; dark energy; dark matter; large-scale structure of Universe

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy [DE-FG02-95ER40899]
  2. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1210974] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dark matter N-body simulations provide a powerful tool to model the clustering of galaxies and help interpret the results of galaxy redshift surveys. However, the galaxy properties predicted from N-body simulations are not necessarily representative of the observed galaxy populations; for example, theoretical uncertainties arise from the absence of baryons in N-body simulations. In this work, we assess how the uncertainties in N-body simulations impact the cosmological parameters inferred from galaxy redshift surveys. Applying the halo model framework, we find that the velocity bias of galaxies in modelling the redshift-space distortions is likely to be the predominant source of systematic bias. For a deep, wide survey like BigBOSS, current 10 per cent uncertainties in the velocity bias limit k(max) to 0.14 h Mpc(-1). In contrast, we find that the uncertainties related to the density profiles and the galaxy occupation statistics lead to relatively insignificant systematic biases. Therefore, the ability to calibrate the velocity bias accurately - from observations as well as simulations - will likely set the ultimate limit on the smallest length scale that can be used to infer cosmological information from galaxy clustering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available