4.7 Article

Precise measurement of the radial baryon acoustic oscillation scales in galaxy redshift surveys

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 434, Issue 3, Pages 2008-2019

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1146

Keywords

cosmological parameters; dark energy; large-scale structure of Universe

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN) [AYA2009-13936-C06-03, AYA2009-13936-C06-06]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN) through the Consolider Ingenio programme [CSD2007-00060]
  3. JAE-predoc contract
  4. Madrid Regional Government (CAM) [HEPHACOS S2009/ESP-1473-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we present a new method to extract cosmological parameters using the radial scale of the baryon acoustic oscillations as a standard ruler in deep galaxy surveys. The method consists of an empirical parametrization of the radial two-point correlation function, which provides a robust and precise extraction of the sound horizon scale at the baryon drag epoch. Moreover, it uses data from galaxy surveys in a manner that is fully cosmology independent and therefore unbiased. A study of the main systematic errors and the validation of the method in cosmological simulations are also presented, showing that the measurement is limited only by cosmic variance. We then study the full information contained in the baryon acoustic oscillations, obtaining that the combination of the radial and angular determinations of this scale is a very sensitive probe of cosmological parameters, able to set strong constraints on the dark energy properties, even without combining it with any other probe. We compare the results obtained using this method with those from more traditional approaches, showing that the sensitivity to the cosmological parameters is of the same order, while the measurements use only observable quantities and are fully cosmology independent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available