4.7 Article

Evidence for spin alignment of spiral and elliptical/S0 galaxies in filaments

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 428, Issue 2, Pages 1827-1836

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sts162

Keywords

methods: statistical; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: general; galaxies: statistics; large-scale structure of Universe

Funding

  1. Estonian Science Foundation [7765, 8005, 9428, MJD272]
  2. Estonian Ministry for Education and Science [SF0060067s08]
  3. Centre of Excellence of Dark Matter in (Astro)particle Physics and Cosmology [TK120]
  4. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  5. National Science Foundation
  6. US Department of Energy Office of Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Galaxies are not distributed randomly in the cosmic web but are instead arranged in filaments and sheets surrounding cosmic voids. Observationally, there is still no convincing evidence of a link between the properties of galaxies and their host structures. However, by the tidal torque theory (our understanding of the origin of galaxy angular momentum), such a link should exist. Using the presently largest spectroscopic galaxy redshift survey (Sloan Digital Sky Survey), we study the connection between the spin axes of galaxies and the orientation of their host filaments. We use a 3D field of orientations to describe cosmic filaments. To restore the inclination angles of galaxies, we use a 3D photometric model of galaxies that gives these angles more accurately than traditional 2D models. We found evidence that the spin axes of bright spiral galaxies have a weak tendency to be aligned parallel to filaments. For elliptical/S0 galaxies, we have a statistically significant result that their spin axes are aligned preferentially perpendicular to the host filaments; we show that this signal practically does not depend on the accuracy of the estimated inclination angles for elliptical/S0 galaxies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available