4.7 Article

The Arizona CDFS Environment Survey (ACES): A Magellan/IMACS Spectroscopic Survey of the Chandra Deep Field-South

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 425, Issue 3, Pages 2116-2127

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21524.x

Keywords

catalogues; surveys; galaxies: distances and redshifts

Funding

  1. NASA [HF-51269.01-A, NAS 5-26555]
  2. Space Telescope Science Institute
  3. Southern California Center for Galaxy Evolution
  4. University of California Office of Research
  5. NSF [AST-0806732]
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0806732] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the Arizona CDFS Environment Survey (ACES), a recently completed spectroscopic redshift survey of the Chandra Deep Field-South (CDFS) conducted using the Inamori-Magellan Areal Camera and Spectrograph on the Magellan-Baade telescope. In total, the survey targeted 7277 unique sources down to a limiting magnitude of RAB = 24.1, yielding 5080 secure redshifts across the similar to 30?arcmin X 30?arcmin extended CDFS region. The ACES data set delivers a significant increase to both the spatial coverage and the sampling density of the spectroscopic observations in the field. Combined with previously published spectroscopic redshifts, ACES now creates a highly complete survey of the galaxy population at R < 23, enabling the local galaxy density (or environment) on relatively small scales (similar to 1?Mpc) to be measured at z < 1 in one of the most heavily studied and data-rich fields in the sky. Here, we describe the motivation, design and implementation of the survey and present a preliminary redshift and environment catalogue. In addition, we utilize the ACES spectroscopic redshift catalogue to assess the quality of photometric redshifts from both the COMBO-17 and Multiwavelength Survey by Yale-Chile imaging surveys of the CDFS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available