4.7 Article

On the masses of OJ287 black holes

Journal

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21861.x

Keywords

BL Lacertae objects: individual: OJ287; galaxies: active

Funding

  1. ESA member states
  2. NASA
  3. European Community's Human Potential Programme [HPRN-CT-2002-00321]
  4. European Commission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two multifrequency campaigns were carried out on OJ287 in 2005: in April when it was in its pre-outburst state, and in November during the main 12 yr cycle outburst. The wavelength coverage was from radio to X-rays. In the optical-to-ultraviolet range, the differential spectrum between the observations has a bremsstrahlung spectral shape, consistent with gas at 3 x 10(5) K temperature. Our result supports the hydrogen column density of the OJ287 host galaxy of similar to 9.3 x 10(20) cm(-2), the average value found by Ghosh & Soundararajaperumal. The 3 x 10(5) K bremsstrahlung radiation was predicted in the binary black hole model of OJ287, and it arises from a hot bubble of gas which is torn off the accretion disc by the impact of the secondary. As this radiation is not Doppler boosted, the brightness of the outburst provides an estimate for the mass of the secondary black hole, similar to 1.4 x 10(8) M-circle dot. In order to estimate the mass of the primary black hole, we ask what is the minimum mass ratio in a binary system which allows the stability of the accretion disc. By using particle simulations, we find that the ratio is similar to 1.3 x 10(2). This makes the minimum mass of the primary similar to 1.8 x 10(10) M-circle dot, in agreement with the mass determined from the orbit solution, 1.84 x 10(10) M-circle dot. With this mass value and the measured K magnitude of the bulge of the host galaxy of OJ287, the system lies almost exactly on the previously established correlation in the black hole mass versus K-magnitude diagram. It supports the extension of this correlation to brighter magnitudes and to more massive black holes than has been done previously.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available