4.7 Article

Modelling fully convective stars in eclipsing binaries: KOI-126 and CM Draconis

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 422, Issue 3, Pages 2255-2261

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20769.x

Keywords

convection; methods: numerical; binaries: eclipsing; stars: interiors; stars: low-mass

Funding

  1. Yale Institute for Biospheric Studies through the YIBS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present models of the components of the systems KOI-126 and CM Draconis, the two eclipsing binary systems known to date to contain stars with masses low enough to have fully convective interiors. We are able to model satisfactorily the system KOI-126, finding consistent solutions for the radii and surface temperatures of all three components, using a solar-like value of the mixing-length parameter a in the convection zone and phoenix NextGen 1D model atmospheres for the surface boundary conditions. Depending on the chemical composition, we estimate the age of the system to be in the range 35 Gyr. For CM Draconis, on the other hand, we cannot reconcile our models with the observed radii and Teff using the current metal-poor composition estimate based on kinematics. Higher metallicities lessen but do not remove the discrepancy. We then explore the effect of varying the mixing-length parameter a. As previously noted in the literature, a reduced a can be used as a simple measure of the lower convective efficiency due to rotation and induced magnetic fields. Our models show a sensitivity to a (for a < 1.0) sufficient to partially account for the radius discrepancies. It is, however, impossible to reconcile the models with the observations on the basis of the effect of the reduced a alone. We therefore suggest that the combined effects of high metallicity and a reduction could explain the observations of CM Draconis. For example, increasing the metallicity of the system towards super-solar values (i.e. Z= 2 Z?) yields an agreement within 2s with a= 1.0.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available