4.7 Article

On the HU Aquarii planetary system hypothesis

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 425, Issue 2, Pages 930-949

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21341.x

Keywords

methods: data analysis; methods: numerical; techniques: photometric; celestial mechanics; planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [N/N203/402739]
  2. POWIEW project of the European Regional Development Fund in Innovative Economy Programme [POIG.02.03.00-00-018/08]
  3. EU FP6 Transfer of Knowledge Project 'Astrophysics of Neutron Stars' [MKTD-CT-2006-042722]
  4. Foundation for Polish Science [FNP HOM/2009/11B]
  5. Marie Curie European Reintegration Grant within the 7th European Community Framework Programme [PERG05-GA-2009-249168]
  6. KRCF Young Researcher Fellowship Program at the Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute
  7. NASA Astrobiology Institute at the Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii [NNA09DA77A]
  8. NASA/EXOB program [NNX09AN05G]
  9. Alfried Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach Foundation, Essen
  10. Skinakas Observatory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we investigate the eclipse timing of the polar binary HU?Aquarii that has been observed for almost two decades. Recently, Qian et al. attributed large (OC) deviations between the eclipse ephemeris and observations to a compact system of two massive Jovian companions. We improve the Keplerian, kinematic model of the light travel time effect and re-analyse the whole currently available data set. We add almost 60 new, yet unpublished, mostly precision light curves obtained using the time high-resolution photopolarimeter Optical Timing Analyzer (OPTIMA), as well as photometric observations performed at the Monitoring Network of Telescopes/North, Physics Innovations Robotic Astronomical Telescope Explorer and Carlos Sanchez Telescope. We determine new mid-egress times with a mean uncertainty at the level of 1?s or better. We claim that because the observations that currently exist in the literature are non-homogeneous with respect to spectral windows (ultraviolet, X-ray, visual and polarimetric mode) and the reported mid-egress measurements errors, they may introduce systematics that affect orbital fits. Indeed, we find that the published data, when taken literally, cannot be explained by any unique solution. Many qualitatively different and best-fit two-planet configurations, including self-consistent, Newtonian N-body solutions may be able to explain the data. However, using high-resolution, precision OPTIMA light curves, we find that the (OC) deviations are best explained by the presence of a single circumbinary companion orbiting at a distance of similar to 4.5?au with a small eccentricity and having similar to 7 Jupiter masses. This object could be the next circumbinary planet detected from the ground, similar to the announced companions around close binaries HW?Vir, NN?Ser, UZ?For, DP?Leo, FS?Aur or SZ?Her, and planets of this type around Kepler-16, Kepler-34 and Kepler-35.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available