4.7 Article

Resolving subhaloes' lives with the Hierarchical Bound-Tracing algorithm

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 427, Issue 3, Pages 2437-2449

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22111.x

Keywords

methods: data analysis; methods: numerical; dark matter

Funding

  1. NSFC [10821302, 10878001, 11033006, 11073017]
  2. 973 Programme [2007CB815402]
  3. CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Programme for Creative Research Teams [KJCX2-YW-T23]
  4. European Commission's Framework Programme 7, through the Marie Curie Initial Training Network Cosmo-Comp [PITN-GA-2009-238356]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We develop a new code, the Hierarchical Bound-Tracing (hbt for short) code, to find and trace dark matter subhaloes in simulations based on the merger hierarchy of dark matter haloes. Application of this code to a recent benchmark test of finding subhaloes demonstrates that hbt stands as one of the best codes to trace the evolutionary history of subhaloes. The success of the code lies in its careful treatment of the complex physical processes associated with the evolution of subhaloes and in its robust unbinding algorithm with an adaptive source-subhalo management. We keep a full record of the merger hierarchy of haloes and subhaloes, and allow the growth of satellite subhaloes through accretion from its satellite-of-satellites, hence allowing mergers among satellites. Local accretion of background mass is omitted, while rebinding of stripped mass is allowed. The justification of these treatments is provided by case studies of the lives of individual subhaloes and by the success in finding the complete subhalo catalogue. We compare our result to other popular subhalo finders and show that hbt is able to well resolve subhaloes in high-density environment and keeps strict physical track of subhaloes merger history. This code is fully parallelized and freely available upon request to the authors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available