4.7 Article

Magnetic domination of recollimation boundary layers in relativistic jets

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 426, Issue 1, Pages 595-600

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21876.x

Keywords

MHD; relativistic processes; shock waves; galaxies: active; galaxies: jets

Funding

  1. NSF [AST-0907872]
  2. NASA Astrophysics Theory Programme [NNX09AG02G]
  3. NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope Guest Investigator programme
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0907872] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the collimation of relativistic magnetohydrodynamic jets by the pressure of an ambient medium, in the limit where the jet interior loses causal contact with its surroundings. This follows up a hydrodynamic study in a previous paper, adding the effects of a toroidal magnetic field threading the jet. As the ultrarelativistic jet encounters an ambient medium with a pressure profile with a radial scaling of p ? r-? where 2 < ? < 4, it loses causal contact with its surroundings and forms a boundary layer with a large pressure gradient. By constructing self-similar solutions to the fluid equations within this boundary layer, we examine the structure of this layer as a function of the external pressure profile. We show that the boundary layer always becomes magnetically dominated far from the source, and that in the magnetic limit, physical self-similar solutions are admitted in which the total pressure within the layer decreases linearly with distance from the contact discontinuity inwards. These solutions suggest a hollow-cone behaviour of the jet, with the boundary-layer thickness prescribed by the value of ?. In contrast to the hydrodynamical case, however, the boundary layer contains an asymptotically vanishing fraction of the jet energy flux.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available