4.7 Review

The gas-phase metallicity of central and satellite galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 425, Issue 1, Pages 273-286

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21454.x

Keywords

galaxies: abundances; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: fundamental parameters; galaxies: groups: general; galaxies: star formation

Funding

  1. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  2. American Museum of Natural History
  3. Astrophysical lnstitute Postdam
  4. University of Basel
  5. University of Cambridge
  6. Case Western Reserve University
  7. University of Chicago
  8. Drexel University
  9. Fermilab
  10. lnstitute for Advanced Study
  11. Japan Participation Group
  12. John Hopkins University
  13. Joint lnstitute for Nuclear Astrophysics
  14. Kavli lnstitute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology
  15. Korean Scientist Group
  16. Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST)
  17. Los Alamos National Laboratory
  18. Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MIPA)
  19. New Mexico State University
  20. Ohio State University
  21. National Science Foundation
  22. U.S Department of Energy
  23. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  24. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  25. Max Planck Society
  26. High Education Funding Council for England

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We exploit the galaxy groups catalogue of Yang et al. and the galaxy properties measured in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Releases 4 and 7 to study how the gas-phase metallicities of star-forming galaxies depend on environment. We find that satellite and central galaxies follow a qualitatively similar stellar mass (M-star)gas-phase metallicity relation, whereby their gas-phase metallicity increases with M-star. Satellites, though, have higher gas-phase metallicities than equally massive centrals, and this difference increases with decreasing stellar mass. We find a maximum offset of 0.06 dex at log(M-star/h(-2)M(circle dot)) similar or equal to 8.25. At fixed halo mass, centrals are more metal rich than satellites by similar to 0.5 dex on average. This is simply due to the fact that, by definition, centrals are the most massive galaxies in their groups, and the fact that gas-phase metallicity increases with stellar mass. More interestingly, we also find that the gas-phase metallicity of satellites increases with halo mass (Mh) at fixed stellar mass. This increment is more pronounced for less massive galaxies, and, at M-star similar or equal to 10(9) h(-2) M-circle dot, corresponds to similar to 0.15 dex across the range 11 < log(M-h/h(-1) M-circle dot) < 14. We also show that low-mass satellite galaxies have higher gas-phase metallicities than central galaxies of the same stellar metallicity. This difference becomes negligible for more massive galaxies of roughly solar metallicity. We demonstrate that the observed differences in gas-phase metallicity between centrals and satellites at fixed M-star are not a consequence of stellar mass stripping (advocated by Pasquali et al. in order to explain similar differences but in stellar metallicity), nor to the past star formation history of these galaxies as quantified by their surface mass density or gas mass fraction. Rather, we argue that these trends probably originate from a combination of three environmental effects: (i) strangulation, which prevents satellite galaxies from accreting new, low-metallicity gas which would otherwise dilute their interstellar medium; (ii) ram pressure stripping of the outer gas disc, thereby inhibiting radial inflows of low-metallicity gas and (iii) external pressure provided by the hot gas of the host halo which prevents metal-enriched outflows from escaping the galaxies. Each of these three mechanisms naturally explains why the difference in gas-phase metallicity between centrals and satellites increases with decreasing stellar mass and with increasing host halo mass, at least qualitatively. However, more detailed simulations and observations are required in order to discriminate between these mechanisms, and to test, in detail, whether they are consistent with the data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available