4.7 Review

A fundamental problem in our understanding of low-mass galaxy evolution

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 426, Issue 4, Pages 2797-2812

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21931.x

Keywords

galaxies: abundances; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: statistics

Funding

  1. ERC [227749]
  2. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. U.S. Department of Energy
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  6. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  7. Max Planck Society
  8. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  9. American Museum of Natural History
  10. Astrophysical Institute Potsdam
  11. University of Basel
  12. University of Cambridge
  13. Case Western Reserve University
  14. University of Chicago
  15. Drexel University
  16. Fermilab
  17. Institute for Advanced Study
  18. Japan Participation Group
  19. Johns Hopkins University
  20. Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics
  21. Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology
  22. Korean Scientist Group
  23. Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST)
  24. Los Alamos National Laboratory
  25. Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA)
  26. Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA)
  27. New Mexico State University
  28. Ohio State University
  29. University of Pittsburgh
  30. University of Portsmouth
  31. Princeton University
  32. United States Naval Observatory
  33. University of Washington
  34. European Research Council (ERC) [227749] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have found a dramatic difference between the observed number density evolution of low-mass galaxies and that predicted by semi-analytic models. Whilst models accurately reproduce the z = 0 number density, they require that the evolution occurs rapidly at early times, which is incompatible with the strong late evolution found in observational results. We report here the same discrepancy in two state-of-the-art cosmological hydrodynamical simulations, which is evidence that the problem is fundamental. We search for the underlying cause of this problem using two complementary methods. First, we consider a narrow range in stellar mass of log?(Mstar/(h-2?M?)) = 99.5 and look for evidence of a different history of today's low-mass galaxies in models and observations. We find that the exclusion of satellite galaxies from the analysis brings the median ages and star formation rates of galaxies into reasonable agreement. However, the models yield too few young, strongly star-forming galaxies. Secondly, we construct a toy model to link the observed evolution of specific star formation rates with the evolution of the galaxy stellar mass function. We infer from this model that a key problem in both semi-analytic and hydrodynamical models is the presence of a positive instead of a negative correlation between specific star formation rate and stellar mass. A similar positive correlation is found between the specific dark matter halo accretion rate and the halo mass, indicating that model galaxies are growing in a way that follows the growth of their host haloes too closely. It therefore appears necessary to find a mechanism that decouples the growth of low-mass galaxies, which occurs primarily at late times, from the growth of their host haloes, which occurs primarily at early times. We argue that the current form of star formation-driven feedback implemented in most galaxy formation models is unlikely to achieve this goal, owing to its fundamental dependence on host halo mass and time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available