4.7 Article

The bright Type IIP SN 2009bw, showing signs of interaction

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 422, Issue 2, Pages 1122-1139

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20685.x

Keywords

supernovae: general; supernovae: individual: SN 2009bw; galaxies: individual: UGC 2890

Funding

  1. INAF
  2. DFG [SFB 676, GRK 1354]
  3. NSF [AST-0707704]
  4. US DOE [DE-FG02-07ER41517]
  5. Bonino-Pulejo Foundation
  6. Transregional Collaborative Research Center 'The Dark Universe' of the German Research Fondation (DFG) [TRR33]
  7. RFBR [10-02-00249]
  8. [ASI-INAF I/009/10/0]
  9. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G009465/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. STFC [ST/G009465/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present photometry and spectroscopy of the Type IIP supernova (SN IIP) 2009bw in UGC 2890 from a few days after the outburst to 241 d. The light curve of SN 2009bw during the photospheric phase is similar to that of normal SNe IIP but with a brighter peak and plateau (M-R(max) = -17.82 mag, M-R(plateau) = -17.37 mag). The luminosity drop from the photospheric to the nebular phase is one of the fastest ever observed, similar to 2.2mag in about 13 d. The radioactive tail of the bolometric light curve indicates that the amount of ejected Ni-56 is approximate to 0.022 M-circle dot. The photospheric spectra reveal high-velocity lines of H alpha and H beta until about 105 d after the shock breakout, suggesting a possible early interaction between the SN ejecta and pre-existent circumstellar material, and the presence of CNO elements. By modelling the bolometric light curve, ejecta expansion velocity and photospheric temperature, we estimate a total ejected mass of similar to 8-12 M-circle dot, a kinetic energy of similar to 0.3 foe and an initial radius of similar to 3.6-7 x 10(13) cm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available