4.7 Article

The high-redshift (z > 3) active galactic nucleus population in the 4-Ms Chandra Deep Field-South

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 428, Issue 1, Pages 354-369

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sts034

Keywords

methods: data analysis; techniques: imaging spectroscopy; surveys; galaxies: active; galaxies: high-redshift; X-rays: galaxies

Funding

  1. agreement ASI-INAF [I/009/10/0]
  2. PRIN-INAF
  3. CXC [SP1-12007A]
  4. NASA ADP [NNX10AC99G]
  5. USTC [ZC9850290195]
  6. Basal-CATA [PFB-06/2007]
  7. CONICYT-Chile [FONDECYT 1101024]
  8. Chandra X-ray Center [SAO SP1-12007B]
  9. STFC [ST/I001573/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/I001573/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present results from a spectral analysis of a sample of high-redshift (z > 3) X-ray-selected active galactic nucleus (AGN) in the 4-Ms Chandra Deep Field-South (CDF-S), the deepest X-ray survey to date. The sample is selected using the most recent spectroscopic and photometric information available in this field. It consists of 34 sources with median redshift z = 3.7, 80 median net counts in the 0.5-7 keV band and median rest-frame absorption-corrected luminosity L2-10 keV approximate to 1.5 x 10(44) erg s(-1). Spectral analysis for the full sample is presented and the intrinsic column density distribution, corrected for observational biases using spectral simulations, is compared with the expectations of X-ray background (XRB) synthesis models. We find that approximate to 57 per cent of the sources are highly obscured (N-H > 10(23) cm(-2)). Source number counts in the 0.5-2 keV band down to flux F0.5-2 keV approximate to 4 x 10(-17) erg s(-1) cm(-2) are also presented. Our results are consistent with a decline of the AGN space density at z > 3 and suggest that, at those redshifts, the AGN obscured fraction is in agreement with the expectations of XRB synthesis models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available