4.7 Article

Minimally parametric power spectrum reconstruction from the Lyman α forest

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 413, Issue 3, Pages 1717-1728

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18245.x

Keywords

methods: numerical; methods: statistical; intergalactic medium; cosmology: theory

Funding

  1. European Commission [MIRG-CT-2007-203314]
  2. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  3. Leverhulme Trust
  4. STFC
  5. ASI/AAE
  6. INFN-PD51
  7. PRIN-MIUR
  8. PRIN-INAF
  9. ERC
  10. MICINN
  11. [FP7-IDEAS-Phys.LSS 240117]
  12. ICREA Funding Source: Custom
  13. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H004912/1, ST/I506837/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  14. STFC [ST/I506837/1, ST/H004912/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current results from the Lyman alpha forest assume that the primordial power spectrum of density perturbations follows a simple power-law form. We present the first analysis of Lyman alpha data to study the effect of relaxing this strong assumption on primordial and astrophysical constraints. We perform a large suite of numerical simulations, using them to calibrate a minimally parametric framework for describing the power spectrum. Combined with cross-validation, a statistical technique which prevents overfitting of the data, this framework allows us to reconstruct the power spectrum shape without strong prior assumptions. We find no evidence for deviation from scale-invariance; our analysis also shows that current Lyman alpha data do not have sufficient statistical power to robustly probe the shape of the power spectrum at these scales. In contrast, the ongoing Baryon Oscillation Sky Survey will be able to do so with high precision. Furthermore, this near-future data will be able to break degeneracies between the power spectrum shape and astrophysical parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available