4.7 Article

Cluster X-ray luminosity-temperature relation at z ≳ 1.5

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 412, Issue 4, Pages 2391-2395

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18062.x

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: clusters: individual: ISCS J1438+3414; galaxies: clusters: individual: JKCS 041; galaxies: clusters: intracluster medium; X-rays: galaxies: clusters

Funding

  1. ASI-INAF [I/009/10/0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The evolution of the properties of the hot gas that fills the potential well of galaxy clusters is poorly known, since models are unable to give robust predictions, and observations lack a sufficient redshift leverage and are affected by selection effects. Here, with just two high-redshift, z approximate to 1.8, clusters avoiding selection biases, we obtain a significant extension of the redshift range and we begin to constrain the possible evolution of the X-ray luminosity versus temperature relation. The two clusters, JKCS 041 at z = 2.2 and ISCS J1438+3414 at z = 1.41, are, respectively, the most distant and the second most distant clusters, overall, that can be used for studying scaling relations. Their location in the X-ray luminosity versus temperature plane, with an X-ray luminosity five times lower than expected, suggests at the 95 per cent confidence level that the evolution of the intracluster medium has not been self-similar in the last three-quarters of the age of the Universe. Our conclusion is reinforced by data on a third, X-ray-selected, high-redshift cluster, too faint for its temperature when compared to a sample of similarly selected objects. Our data suggest that non-gravitational effects, such as the baryon physics, influence the evolution of galaxy clusters. Precise knowledge of evolution is central for using galaxy clusters as cosmological probes in planned X-ray surveys, such as WFXT or JDEM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available