4.7 Article

The effects of accretion luminosity upon fragmentation in the early universe

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 414, Issue 4, Pages 3633-3644

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18659.x

Keywords

stars: formation; dark ages, reionization, first stars

Funding

  1. Baden-Wurttemberg Stiftung [P-LS-SPII/18]
  2. German Excellence Initiative
  3. NSF [AST-0708795, AST-1009928]
  4. NASA [NNX 08-AL43G, 09-AJ33G]
  5. German Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [05A09VHA]
  6. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [KL 1358/1, KL 1358/4, KL 1359/5, KL 1358/10, KL 1358/11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We introduce a prescription for the luminosity from accreting protostars into smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulation and apply the method to simulations of five primordial minihaloes generated from cosmological initial conditions. We find that accretion luminosity delays fragmentation with in the haloes but does not prevent it. In haloes that slowly form a low number of protostars, the accretion luminosity can reduce the number of fragments that are formed before the protostars start ionizing their surroundings. However, haloes that rapidly form many protostars become dominated by dynamical processes, and the effect of accretion luminosity becomes negligible. Generally, the fragmentation found in the haloes is highly dependent on the initial conditions. Accretion luminosity does not substantially affect the accretion rates experienced by the protostars and is far less important than dynamical interactions, which can lead to ejections that effectively terminate the accretion. We find that the accretion rates on to the inner regions of the discs (20 au) around the protostars are highly variable, in contrast to the constant or smoothly decreasing accretion rates currently used in models of the pre-main-sequence evolution of Population III stars.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available