4.7 Article

On the α formalism for the common envelope interaction

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 411, Issue 4, Pages 2277-2292

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17891.x

Keywords

stars: evolution; binaries: close; stars: horizontal branch; white dwarfs; planetary nebulae: general

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [AST-0607111, PHY 05-51164, AST 07-07633]
  2. NSERV

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The alpha formalism is a common way to parametrize the common envelope interaction between a giant star and a more compact companion. The alpha parameter describes the fraction of orbital energy released by the companion that is available to eject the giant star's envelope. By using new, detailed stellar evolutionary calculations, we derive a user-friendly prescription for the lambda parameter and an improved approximation for the envelope binding energy, thus revising the alpha equation. We then determine alpha both from simulations and from observations in a self-consistent manner. By using our own stellar structure models as well as population considerations to reconstruct the primary's parameters at the time of the common envelope interaction, we gain a deeper understanding of the uncertainties. We find that systems with very low values of q (the ratio of the companion's mass to the mass of the primary at the time of the common envelope interaction) have higher values of alpha. A fit to the data suggests that lower-mass companions are left at comparable or larger orbital separations to more massive companions. We conjecture that lower-mass companions take longer than a stellar dynamical time to spiral into the giant's core, and that this is key to allowing the giant to use its own thermal energy to help unbind its envelope. As a result, although systems with light companions might not have enough orbital energy to unbind the common envelope, they might stimulate a stellar reaction that results in the common envelope ejection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available