4.7 Article

Rest-frame ultraviolet-to-optical spectral characteristics of extremely metal-poor and metal-free galaxies

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 415, Issue 3, Pages 2920-2931

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18906.x

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: high-redshift; cosmology: observations

Funding

  1. Institute for Industrial Research
  2. Osaka Sangyo University
  3. KAKENHI [19740108]
  4. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19740108] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Finding the first generation of galaxies in the early Universe is the greatest step forward towards understanding galaxy formation and evolution. For a strategic survey of such galaxies and the interpretation of the obtained data, this paper presents an ultraviolet-to-optical spectral model of galaxies with a great care of the nebular emission. In particular, we present a machinereadable table of intensities of 119 nebular emission lines from Ly alpha to the rest-frame 1 mu m as a function of metallicity from zero to the solar one. Based on the spectral model, we present criteria of equivalent widths of Ly alpha, He II lambda 1640, H alpha, H beta and [OIII]lambda 5007 to select extremely metal-poor and metal-free galaxies although these criteria have uncertainty caused by the Lyman continuum escape fraction and the star formation duration. We also present criteria of broad-band colours which will be useful to select candidates for spectroscopic follow-up from drop-out galaxies. We propose the line intensity ratio of [OIII]lambda 5007 to H beta < 0.1 as the most robust criterion for < 1/1000 of the solar metallicity. This ratio of a galaxy with a few M(circle dot)yr(-1) at z similar to 8 is detectable by spectroscopy with the James Webb Space Telescope within a reasonable exposure time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available