4.7 Article

Cosmography with strong lensing of LISA gravitational wave sources

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 415, Issue 3, Pages 2773-2781

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18895.x

Keywords

gravitational lensing: strong; gravitational waves; methods: statistical; cosmology: theory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) might detect gravitational waves from mergers of massive black hole binaries strongly lensed by intervening galaxies. The detection of multiple gravitational lensing events would provide a new tool for cosmography. Constraints on cosmological parameters could be placed by exploiting either lensing statistics of strongly lensed sources or time-delay measurements of lensed gravitational wave signals. These lensing methods do not need the measurement of the redshifts of the sources and the identification of their electromagnetic counterparts. They would extend cosmological probes to redshift z greater than or similar to 10 and are then complementary to other lower or higher redshift tests, such as Type Ia supernovae or cosmic microwave background. The accuracy of lensing tests strongly depends on the formation history of the merging binaries, and the related number of total detectable multiple images. Lensing amplification might also help to find the host galaxies. Any measurement of the source redshifts would allow us to exploit the distance-redshift test in combination with lensing methods. Time-delay analyses might measure the Hubble parameter H-0 with an accuracy of greater than or similar to 10 km s(-1) Mpc(-1). With prior knowledge of H-0, lensing statistics and time delays might constrain the dark matter density (delta Omega(M) greater than or similar to 0.08, due to parameter degeneracy). Inclusion of our methods with other available orthogonal techniques might significantly reduce the uncertainty contours for Omega(M) and the dark energy equation of state.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available