4.7 Article

The 2M++ galaxy redshift catalogue

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 416, Issue 4, Pages 2840-2856

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19233.x

Keywords

methods: data analysis; methods: numerical; methods: observational; catalogues; galaxies: luminosity function, mass function; large-scale structure of Universe

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  4. Participating Institutions
  5. US Department of Energy
  6. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  7. Max Planck Society
  8. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  9. NSF [AST 07-08849, AST 09-08693]
  10. NSERC
  11. Programme visiteur de l'IAP
  12. French ANR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Peculiar velocities arise from gravitational instability, and thus are linked to the surrounding distribution of matter. In order to understand the motion of the Local Group with respect to the cosmic microwave background, a deep all-sky map of the galaxy distribution is required. Here we present a new redshift compilation of 69 160 galaxies, dubbed 2M++, to map large-scale structures of the local Universe over nearly the whole sky, and reaching depths of K <= 12.5, or 200 h(-1) Mpc. The target catalogue is based on the Two-Micron All-Sky Survey Extended Source Catalog (2MASS-XSC). The primary sources of redshifts are the 2MASS Redshift Survey, the 6dF galaxy redshift survey and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (Data Release 7). We assess redshift completeness in each region and compute the weights required to correct for redshift incompleteness and apparent magnitude limits, and discuss corrections for incompleteness in the zone of avoidance. We present the density field for this survey, and discuss the importance of large-scale structures such as the Shapley Concentration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available