4.7 Article

Little change in the sizes of the most massive galaxies since z=1

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 414, Issue 1, Pages 445-457

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18404.x

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD

Funding

  1. Liverpool John Moores University
  2. STFC
  3. Royal Society
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F007159/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. STFC [ST/F007159/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent reports suggest that elliptical galaxies have increased their size dramatically over the last similar to 8 Gyr. This result points to a major rethink of the processes dominating the late-time evolution of galaxies. In this paper we present the first estimates for the scale sizes of brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) in the redshift range 0.8 < z < 1.3 from an analysis of deep Hubble Space Telescope imaging, comparing to a well-matched local sample taken from the Local Cluster Substructure Survey at z similar to 0.2. For a small sample of five high-redshift BCGs we measure half-light radii ranging from 14 to 53 kpc using de Vaucuoleurs profile fits, with an average determined from stacking of 32.1 +/- 2.5 kpc compared to a value 43.2 +/- 1.0 kpc for the low-redshift comparison sample. This implies that the scale sizes of BCGs at z = 1 are similar or equal to 30 per cent smaller than at z = 0.25. Analyses comparing either Sersic or Petrosian radii also indicate little or no evolution between the two samples. The detection of only modest evolution at most out to z = 1 argues against BCGs having undergone the large increase in size reported for massive galaxies since z = 2 and in fact the scale-size evolution of BCGs appears closer to that reported for radio galaxies over a similar epoch. We conclude that this lack of size evolution, particularly when coupled with recent results on the lack of BCG stellar mass evolution, demonstrates that major merging is not an important process in the late-time evolution of these systems. The homogeneity and maturity of BCGs at z = 1 continues to challenge galaxy evolution models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available