4.7 Article

Are supermassive black holes shrouded by 'super-Oort' clouds of comets and asteroids?

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 419, Issue 2, Pages 1238-1247

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19777.x

Keywords

accretion, accretion discs; Galaxy: centre; galaxies: active

Funding

  1. STFC Rolling Grant
  2. Russian Academy of Sciences [RFBR 09-02-00867a, NSh-5069.2010.2, P-19, OFN-16]
  3. Dynasty Foundation
  4. STFC [ST/H002235/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H002235/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The last decade has seen a dramatic confirmation that in situ star formation is possible inside the inner parsec of the Milky Way. Here we suggest that giant planets, solid terrestrial-like planets, comets and asteroids may also form in these environments, and that this may have observational implications for active galactic nuclei (AGN). Like in debris discs around main-sequence stars, collisions of large solid objects should initiate strong fragmentation cascades. The smallest particles in such a cascade the microscopic dust may provide a significant opacity. We put a number of observational and physical constraints on AGN obscuring tori resulting from such fragmentation cascades. We find that tori fed by fragmenting asteroids disappear at both low and high AGN luminosities. At high luminosities, L similar to LEdd, where LEdd is the Eddington limit, the AGN radiation pressure blows out the microscopic dust too rapidly. At low luminosities, on the other hand, the AGN discs may avoid gravitational fragmentation into stars and solids. We also note that these fragmentation cascades may be responsible for astrophysically large dust particles of m sizes that were postulated by some authors to explain unusual absorption properties of the AGN tori.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available