4.7 Article

The Planck-ATCA Co-eval Observations project: the bright sample

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 415, Issue 2, Pages 1597-1610

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18802.x

Keywords

galaxies: active; cosmic background radiation; radio continuum: galaxies; radio continuum: general

Funding

  1. ASI (ASI/INAF) [I/072/09/0, I/016/07/0 COFIS]
  2. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [AYA2010-21766-C03-01, CSD2010-00064]
  3. Australian Federation [FF0345330]
  4. Commonwealth of Australia
  5. Australian Research Council [FF0345330] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Planck Australia Telescope Compact Array (Planck-ATCA) Co-eval Observations (PACO) have provided flux density measurements of well-defined samples of Australia Telescope 20 GHz (AT20G) radio sources at frequencies below and overlapping with Planck frequency bands, almost simultaneously with Planck observations. We have observed with the ATCA a total of 482 sources in the frequency range between 4.5 and 40 GHz in the period between 2009 July and 2010 August. Several sources were observed more than once. In this paper we present the aims of the project, the selection criteria, and the observation and data reduction procedures. We also discuss the data in total intensity for a complete sample of 189 sources with S-20 GHz > 500 mJy, Galactic latitude |b| > 5 degrees and declination delta < -30 degrees, and some statistical analysis of the spectral behaviour and variability of this sample, referred to as the 'bright PACO sample'. Finally, we discuss how these data could be used to transfer absolute calibrations to ground-based telescopes using the cosmic microwave background dipole calibrated flux densities measured by the Planck satellite, and we provide some test fluxes on bright calibrators.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available