4.7 Article

On the puzzling plateau in the specific star formation rate at z=2-7

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 417, Issue 4, Pages 2737-2751

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19440.x

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: statistics

Funding

  1. ISF [6/08]
  2. GIF [G-1052-104.7/2009]
  3. DIP
  4. NSF [AST-1010033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The observational indications for a constant specific star formation rate (sSFR) in the redshift range z= 27 are puzzling in the context of current galaxy-formation models. Despite the tentative nature of the data, their marked conflict with theory motivates a study of the possible implications. The plateau at sSFR similar to 2 Gyr-1 is hard to reproduce because (a) its level is low compared to the cosmological specific accretion rate at z= 6, (b) it is higher than the latter at z similar to 2, (c) the natural correlation between SFR and stellar mass makes it difficult to manipulate their ratio, and (d) a low SFR at a high z makes it hard to produce enough massive galaxies by z similar to 2. Using a flexible semi-analytic model, we explore ad hoc modifications to the standard physical recipes trying to obey the puzzling observational constraints. Successful models involve non-trivial modifications, such as (a) a suppressed SFR at z= 4 in galaxies of all masses, by enhanced feedback or reduced SFR efficiency, following an initial active phase at z > 7; (b) a delayed gas consumption into stars, allowing the gas that was prohibited from forming stars or ejected at high z to form stars later in more massive galaxies; and (c) enhanced growth of massive galaxies, in terms of either faster assembly or more efficient starbursts in mergers, or by efficient star formation in massive haloes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available