4.7 Article

Population III stars and the long gamma-ray burst rate

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 416, Issue 4, Pages 2760-2767

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19238.x

Keywords

methods: numerical; stars: Population III; gamma-rays: general

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Because massive, low-metallicity Population III (PopIII) stars may produce very powerful long gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs), high-redshift GRB observations could probe the properties of the first stars. We analyse the correlation between early PopIII stars and LGRBs by using cosmological N-body/hydrodynamical simulations, which include detailed chemical evolution, cooling, star formation, feedback effects and the transition between PopIII and more standard Population I/II (PopII/I) stars. From the Swift observed rate of LGRBs, we estimate the fraction of black holes that will produce a GRB from PopII/I stars to be in the range 0.028 < f(GRB) < 0.140, depending on the assumed upper metallicity of the progenitor. Assuming that as of today no GRB event has been associated with a PopIII star, we estimate the upper limit for the fraction of LGRBs produced by PopIII stars to be in the range 0.006 < f(GRB) < 0.022. When we apply a detection threshold compatible with the BAT instrument, we find that the expected fraction of PopIII GRBs (GRB3) is similar to 10 per cent of the full LGRB population at z > 6, becoming as high as 40 per cent at z > 10. Finally, we study the properties of the galaxies hosting our sample of GRB3s. We find that the average metallicity of the galaxies hosting a GRB3 is typically higher than the critical metallicity used to select the PopIII stars, due to the efficiency in polluting the gas above such low values. We also find that the highest probability of finding a GRB3 occurs within galaxies with a stellar mass < 10(7) M-circle dot, independent of the redshift.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available