4.7 Article

Extinction law in ultraluminous infrared galaxies at z∼1

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 418, Issue 1, Pages 625-637

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19512.x

Keywords

supernovae: general; dust, extinction; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: ISM; galaxies: starburst; infrared: galaxies

Funding

  1. JPSP [20340038, 22111503, 20001003]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23224004, 22684004] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We analyse the multiwavelength photometric and spectroscopic data of 12 ultraluminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs) at z similar to 1 and compare them with models of stars and dust in order to study the extinction law and star formation in young infrared (IR) galaxies. Five extinction curves, namely the Milky Way (MW), the pseudo-MW which is MW-like without the 2175 angstrom feature, the Calzetti and two supernova (SN) dust curves are applied to the data by combining with various dust distributions, namely the uniform dust screen, the clumpy dust screen, the internal dust geometry, and the composite geometry with a combination of dust screen and internal dust. Employing a minimum 2 method, we find that the foreground dust screen geometry, especially combined with the 840 M SN extinction curve, provides a good approximation to the real dust geometry, whereas internal dust is only significant in two galaxies. The SN extinction curves, which are flatter than the others, reproduce the data of eight (67 per cent) galaxies better. Dust masses are estimated to be in excess of similar to 108 M. The inferred ages of the galaxies are small, eight of which range from 10 to 650 Myr. The SN-origin dust is the most plausible to account for the vast amount of dust masses and the flat slope of the observed extinction law. The inferred dust mass per SN ranges from 0.01 to 0.4 M per SN.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available