4.7 Article

Star cluster collisions - a formation scenario for the extended globular cluster Scl-dE1 GC1

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 413, Issue 4, Pages 2606-2614

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18331.x

Keywords

methods: numerical; galaxies: dwarf; galaxies: star clusters

Funding

  1. CONICYT
  2. MECESUP [FSM0605]
  3. FONDECYT [1095092]
  4. Royal Society
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H002235/1, PP/E00119X/1, ST/H00856X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. STFC [ST/H00856X/1, PP/E00119X/1, ST/H002235/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent observations of the dwarf elliptical galaxy Scl-dE1 (Sc22) in the Sculptor group of galaxies revealed an extended globular cluster (Scl-dE1 GC1), which exhibits an extremely large core radius of about 21.2 pc. The authors of the discovery paper speculate on whether this object could reside in its own dark matter halo and/or if it might have formed through the merging of two or more star clusters. In this paper, we present N-body simulations to explore thoroughly this particular formation scenario. We follow the merger of two star clusters within dark matter haloes of a range of masses (as well as in the absence of a dark matter halo). In order to obtain a remnant which resembles the observed extended star cluster, we find that the star formation efficiency has to be quite high (around 33 per cent) and the dark matter halo, if present at all, has to be of very low mass, i.e. raising the mass-to-light ratio of the object within the body of the stellar distribution by at most a factor of a few. We also find that expansion of a single star cluster following mass loss provides another viable formation path. Finally, we show that future measurements of the velocity dispersion of this system may be able to distinguish between the various scenarios we have explored.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available