4.7 Article

Detailed cluster lensing profiles at large radii and the impact on cluster weak lensing studies

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 414, Issue 3, Pages 1851-1861

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18481.x

Keywords

gravitational lensing: weak; galaxies: clusters: general; cosmology: theory; dark matter

Funding

  1. JSPS Promotion of Science [21740202]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21740202, 23540324] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using a large set of ray tracing in N-body simulations, we examine lensing profiles around massive dark haloes in detail, with a particular emphasis on the profile at around the virial radii. We compare radial convergence profiles, which are measured accurately in the raytracing simulations by stacking many dark haloes, with our simple analytic model predictions. Our analytic models consist of a main halo, which is modelled by the Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) density profile with three different forms of the truncation, plus the correlated matter (two-halo term) around the main halo. We find that the smoothly truncated NFW profile best reproduces the simulated lensing profiles, out to more than 10 times the virial radius. We then use this analytic model to investigate potential biases in cluster weak lensing studies in which a single, untruncated NFW component is usually assumed in interpreting observed signals. We find that cluster masses, inferred by fitting reduced tangential shear profiles with the NFW profile, tend to be underestimated by similar to 5-10 per cent if fitting is performed out to similar to 10-30 arcmin. In contrast, the concentration parameter is overestimated typically by similar to 20 per cent for the same fitting range. We also investigate biases in computing the signal-to-noise ratio of weak lensing mass peaks, finding them to be similar to 4 per cent for significant mass peaks. In the appendices, we provide useful formulae for the smoothly truncated NFW profile.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available