4.7 Article

Peculiar Type II supernovae from blue supergiants

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 415, Issue 1, Pages 372-382

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18708.x

Keywords

supernovae: general; supernovae: individual: SN 2000cb; supernovae: individual: SN 1987A; supernovae: individual: SN 2005ci; supernovae: individual: SN 1998A; supernovae: individual: SN 1999em

Funding

  1. Einstein Fellowship
  2. US Department of Energy [DE-FG02-06ER06-04]
  3. NSF [AST-0908886, AST-0907903]
  4. TABASGO Foundation
  5. Sun Microsystems, Inc.
  6. Hewlett-Packard Company
  7. AutoScope Corporation
  8. Lick Observatory
  9. University of California
  10. Sylvia & Jim Katzman Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The vast majority of Type II supernovae (SNeII) are produced by red supergiants, but SN 1987A revealed that blue supergiants (BSGs) can produce members of this class as well, albeit with some peculiar properties. This best-studied event revolutionized our understanding of SNe and linking it to the bulk of Type II events is essential. We present here the optical photometry and spectroscopy gathered for SN 2000cb, which is clearly not a standard SNII and yet is not a SN 1987A analogue. The light curve of SN 2000cb is reminiscent of that of SN 1987A in shape, with a slow rise to a late optical peak, but on substantially different time-scales. Spectroscopically, SN 2000cb resembles a normal SNII, but with ejecta velocities that far exceed those measured for SN 1987A or normal SNeII, above 18 000 km s(-1) for H alpha at early times. The red colours, high velocities, late photometric peak and our modelling of this object all point towards a scenario involving the high-energy explosion of a small-radius star, most likely a BSG, producing 0.1 M-circle dot of Ni-56. Adding a similar object to the sample, SN 2005ci, we derive a rate of similar to 2 per cent of the core-collapse rate for this loosely defined class of BSG explosions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available