4.7 Article

The spatial distribution of cold gas in hierarchical galaxy formation models

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 414, Issue 3, Pages 2367-2385

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18556.x

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: luminosity function, mass function; large-scale structure of Universe

Funding

  1. Korean Government
  2. Royal Society
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council at Durham and Leicester
  4. STFC [ST/I001166/1, ST/I00162X/1, ST/H008519/1, ST/F002289/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/I00162X/1, ST/F002289/1, ST/H008519/1, ST/I001166/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The distribution of cold gas in darkmatter haloes is driven by key processes in galaxy formation: gas cooling, galaxy mergers, star formation and reheating of gas by supernovae. We compare the predictions of four different galaxy formation models for the spatial distribution of cold gas. We find that satellite galaxies make little contribution to the abundance or clustering strength of cold gas selected samples, and are far less important than they are in optically selected samples. The halo occupation distribution function of present-day central galaxies with cold gas mass > 10(9) h(-1)M(circle dot) is peaked around a halo mass of approximate to 10(11) h(-1)M(circle dot), a scale that is set by the AGN suppression of gas cooling. The model predictions for the projected correlation function are in good agreement with measurements from the HI Parkes All-Sky Survey. We compare the effective volume of possible surveys with the Square Kilometre Array with those expected for a redshift survey in the near-infrared. Future redshift surveys using neutral hydrogen emission will make possible measurements of the baryonic acoustic oscillations that are competitive with the most ambitious spectroscopic surveys planned in the near-infrared.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available