4.7 Article

The SAURON project - XX. The Spitzer [3.6] - [4.5] colour in early-type galaxies: colours, colour gradients and inverted scaling relations

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 419, Issue 3, Pages 2031-2053

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19855.x

Keywords

galaxies: elliptical and lenticular cD; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: stellar content; infrared: galaxies

Funding

  1. NASA [HST-HF-01202.01-A, NAS 5-26555]
  2. NWO
  3. Institut National des Sciences de l'Univers
  4. Universite Lyon I
  5. Universities of Durham
  6. Groningen
  7. Leiden and Oxford
  8. Programme National Galaxies
  9. British Council
  10. PPARC
  11. Space Christ Church Oxford
  12. Netherlands Research School for Astronomy (NOVA)
  13. Space Telescope Science Institute
  14. Ramon y Cajal Program
  15. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [AYA2010-21322-C03-02]
  16. Royal Society
  17. STFC [PP/E003427/1, ST/H002456/1, ST/G004331/1, ST/I003673/1, ST/F009186/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  18. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H002456/1, ST/F009186/1, PP/E003427/1, ST/I003673/1, ST/G004331/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the [3.6]-[4.5] Spitzer-IRAC colour behaviour of the early-type galaxies of the SAURON survey, a representative sample of 48 nearby ellipticals and lenticulars. We investigate how this colour, which is unaffected by dust extinction, can be used to constrain the stellar populations in these galaxies. We find a tight relation between the [3.6] -[4.5] colour and effective velocity dispersion, a good mass indicator in early-type galaxies: ([3.6] -[4.5])(e) = (-0.109+/-0.007)log sigma(e) + (0.154+/-0.016). Contrary to other colours in the optical and near-infrared, we find that the colours become bluer for larger galaxies. The relations are tighter when using the colour inside r(e) (scatter 0.013 mag), rather than the much smaller r(e)/8 aperture (scatter 0.023 mag), due to the presence of young populations in the central regions. We also obtain strong correlations between the [3.6] -[4.5] colour and three strong absorption lines (H beta, Mgb and Fe 5015). Comparing our data with the models ofMarigo et al., which show that more metal rich galaxies are bluer, we can explain our results in a way consistent with results from the optical, by stating that larger galaxies are more metal rich. The blueing is caused by a strong CO absorption band, whose line strength increases strongly with decreasing temperature and which covers a considerable fraction of the 4.5-mu m filter. In galaxies that contain a compact radio source, the [3.6]-[4.5] colour is generally slightly redder (by 0.015+/-0.007 mag using the r(e)/8 aperture) than in the other galaxies, indicating small amounts of either hot dust, non-thermal emission, or young stars near the centre. We find that the large majority of the galaxies show redder colours with increasing radius. Removing the regions with evidence for young stellar populations (from the H beta absorption line) and interpreting the colour gradients as metallicity gradients, we find that our galaxies are more metal poor going outwards. The radial [3.6]-[4.5] gradients correlate very well with the metallicity gradients derived from optical line indices. We do not find any correlation between the gradients and galaxy mass; at every mass, galaxies display a real range in metallicity gradients. Consistent with our previous work on line indices, we find a tight relation between local [3.6]-[4.5] colour and local escape velocity. The small scatter from galaxy to galaxy, although not negligible, shows that the amount and distribution of the dark matter relative to the visible light cannot be too different from galaxy to galaxy. Due to the lower sensitivity of the [3.6]-[4.5] colour to young stellar populations, this relation is more useful to infer the galaxy potential than the Mgb-v(esc) relation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available