4.7 Article

High-precision photometry by telescope defocusing - III. The transiting planetary system WASP-2☆

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 408, Issue 3, Pages 1680-1688

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17238.x

Keywords

binaries: eclipsing; stars: individual: WASP-2; planetary systems

Funding

  1. STFC [ST/F002599/1]
  2. Northern Ireland Department of Culture, Arts and Leisure (DCAL)
  3. Communaute francaise de Belgique - Actions de recherche concertees - Academie Wallonie-Europe
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/D000955/1, ST/G002355/1, ST/F002599/1, PP/F000057/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. STFC [PP/F000057/1, ST/G002355/1, PP/D000955/1, ST/F002599/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present high-precision photometry of three transits of the extrasolar planetary system WASP-2, obtained by defocusing the telescopes, and achieving scatters of between 0.42 and 0.73 mmag versus the best-fitting model. These data are modelled using the jktebop code, and taking into account the light from the recently discovered faint star close to the system. The physical properties of the WASP-2 system are derived using tabulated predictions from five different sets of stellar evolutionary models, allowing both statistical and systematic error bars to be specified. We find the mass and radius of the planet to be M(b) = 0.846 +/- 0.055 +/- 0.023 M(Jup) and R(b) = 1.043 +/- 0.029 +/- 0.015R(Jup). It has a low equilibrium temperature of 1281 +/- 21 K, in agreement with a recent finding that it does not have an atmospheric temperature inversion. The first of our transit data sets has a scatter of only 0.42 mmag with respect to the best-fitting light-curve model, which to our knowledge is a record for ground-based observations of a transiting extrasolar planetary system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available