4.7 Article

The merger rates and mass assembly histories of dark matter haloes in the two Millennium simulations

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 406, Issue 4, Pages 2267-2278

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16859.x

Keywords

galaxies: formation; cosmology: theory; dark matter; large-scale structure of Universe

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We construct merger trees of dark matter haloes and quantify their merger rates and mass growth rates using the joint data set from the Millennium and Millennium-II simulations. The finer resolution of the Millennium-II simulation has allowed us to extend our earlier analysis of halo merger statistics to an unprecedentedly wide range of descendant halo mass (1010 less than or similar to M(0) less than or similar to 1015 M(circle dot)), progenitor mass ratio (10-5 less than or similar to xi < 1) and redshift (0 < z less than or similar to 15). We update our earlier fitting form for the mean merger rate per halo as a function of M(0), xi and z. The overall behaviour of this quantity is unchanged: the rate per unit redshift is nearly independent of z out to z similar to 15; the dependence on halo mass is weak (proportional to M0.13(0)); and it is nearly a power law in the progenitor mass ratio (proportional to xi-2). We also present a simple and accurate fitting formula for the mean mass growth rate of haloes as a function of mass and redshift. This mean rate is 46 M(circle dot) yr-1 for 1012 M(circle dot) haloes at z = 0, and it increases with mass as proportional to M1.1 and with redshift as (1 + z)2.5 (for z greater than or similar to 1). When the fit for the mean mass growth rate is integrated over a halo's history, we find excellent match to the mean mass assembly histories of the simulated haloes. By combining merger rates and mass assembly histories, we present results for the number of mergers over a halo's history and the statistics of the redshift of the last major merger.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available