4.7 Article

A method for reconstructing the variance of a 3D physical field from 2D observations: application to turbulence in the interstellar medium

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 403, Issue 3, Pages 1507-1515

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16215.x

Keywords

MHD; turbulence; methods: statistical; ISM: clouds; ISM: kinematics and dynamics; ISM: structure

Funding

  1. STFC [ST/F003277/1, MIRG-46555]
  2. University of Exeter, UK
  3. International Max Planck Research School for Astronomy and Cosmic Physics (IMPRS-A)
  4. German Research Foundation [DFG GSC 129/1]
  5. ASC/Alliance Center for Astrophysical Thermonuclear Flashes at the University of Chicago
  6. STFC [ST/F003277/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F003277/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We introduce and test an expression for calculating the variance of a physical field in three dimensions using only information contained in the two-dimensional projection of the field. The method is general but assumes statistical isotropy. To test the method we apply it to numerical simulations of hydrodynamic and magnetohydrodynamic turbulence in molecular clouds, and demonstrate that it can recover the three-dimensional (3D) normalized density variance with similar to 10 per cent accuracy if the assumption of isotropy is valid. We show that the assumption of isotropy breaks down at low sonic Mach number if the turbulence is sub-Alfvenic. Theoretical predictions suggest that the 3D density variance should increase proportionally to the square of the Mach number of the turbulence. Application of our method will allow this prediction to be tested observationally and therefore constrain a large body of analytic models of star formation that rely on it.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available