4.7 Article

The statistics of the subhalo abundance of dark matter haloes

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 410, Issue 4, Pages 2309-2314

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17601.x

Keywords

methods: numerical; galaxies: haloes; dark matter

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Science (CAS)
  2. National Basic Research Programme of China (programme 973) [2009CB24901]
  3. NSFC [10973018]
  4. STFC
  5. Royal Society
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F002300/1, ST/F002289/1, ST/F010176/1, ST/H008519/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. STFC [ST/F002289/1, ST/H008519/1, ST/F010176/1, ST/F002300/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the population statistics of the surviving subhaloes of Lambda CDM dark matter haloes using a set of very high resolution N-body simulations. These include both simulations of representative regions of the Universe and ultra-high resolution resimulations of individual dark matter haloes. We find that more massive haloes tend to have a larger mass fraction in subhaloes. For example, cluster size haloes typically have 7.5 per cent of the mass within R-200 in substructures of fractional mass larger than 10(-5), which is 25 per cent higher than galactic haloes. There is, however, a large variance in the subhalo mass fraction from halo to halo, whereas the subhalo abundance shows much higher regularity. For dark matter haloes of fixed mass, the subhalo abundance decreases by 30 per cent between redshift 2 and 0. The subhalo abundance function correlates with the host halo concentration parameter and formation redshift. However, the intrinsic scatter is not significantly reduced for narrow ranges of concentration parameter or formation redshift, showing that they are not the dominant parameters that determine the subhalo abundance in a halo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available