4.7 Article

Formation of isolated dwarf galaxies with feedback

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 402, Issue 3, Pages 1599-1613

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16035.x

Keywords

methods: N-body simulations; galaxies: dwarf; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; Local Group; cosmology: theory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present results of high-resolution hydrodynamical simulations of the formation and evolution of dwarf galaxies. Our simulations start from cosmological initial conditions at high redshift. They include metal-dependent cooling, star formation, feedback from Type II and Ia supernovae and UV background radiation, with physical recipes identical to those applied in a previous study of Milky Way type galaxies. We find that a combination of feedback and the cosmic UV background results in the formation of galaxies with properties similar to the Local Group dwarf spheroidals, and that their effect is strongly moderated by the depth of the gravitational potential. Taking this into account, our models naturally reproduce the observed luminosities and metallicities. The final objects have halo masses between 2.3 x 108 and 1.1 x 109 M-circle dot, mean velocity dispersions between 6.5 and 9.7 km s-1, stellar masses ranging from 5 x 105 to 1.2 x 107 M-circle dot, median metallicities between [Fe/H] = -1.8 and -1.1 and half-light radii of the order of 200-300 pc, all comparable with Local Group dwarf spheroidals. Our simulations also indicate that the dwarf spheroidal galaxies observed today lie near a halo mass threshold around 109 M-circle dot, in agreement with stellar kinematic data, where supernova feedback not only suffices to completely expel the interstellar medium and leave the residual gas free, but where the combination of feedback, UV radiation and self-shielding establishes a dichotomy of age distributions similar to that observed in the Milky Way and M31 satellites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available