4.7 Article

Detailed cluster mass and light profiles of A1703, A370 and RXJ1347-11 from deep Subaru imaging

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 405, Issue 1, Pages 257-273

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16491.x

Keywords

gravitational lensing; galaxies: clusters: individual: Abell 370; galaxies: clusters: individual: Abell 1703; galaxies: clusters: individual: RXJ1347; 5-1145; galaxies: luminosity function; mass function; dark matter

Funding

  1. Israel Science Foundation [214/02]
  2. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC95-2112-M-001-074-MY2]
  3. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-76SF00515]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Weak lensing work can be badly compromised by unlensed foreground and cluster members which dilute the true lensing signal. We show how the lensing amplitude in multicolour space can be harnessed to securely separate cluster members from the foreground and background populations for three massive clusters, A1703 (z = 0.258), A370 (z = 0.375) and RXJ1347-11 (z = 0.451) imaged with Subaru. The luminosity functions of these clusters when corrected for dilution show similar faint-end slopes, alpha similar or equal to - 1.0, with no marked faint-end upturn to our limit of M(R) similar or equal to - 15.0, and only a mild radial gradient. In each case, the radial profile of the mass-to-light ratio (M/L) peaks at intermediate radius, similar or equal to 0.2r(vir), at a level of 300-500(M/L(R))(circle dot), and then falls steadily towards similar to 100(M/L(R))(circle dot) at the virial radius, similar to the mean field level. This behaviour is likely due to the relative paucity of central late-type galaxies, whereas for the E/S0 sequence only a mild radial decline in M/L is found for each cluster. We discuss this behaviour in the context of detailed simulations where predictions for tidal stripping may now be tested accurately with observations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available