4.7 Article

On the fraction of star clusters surviving the embedded phase

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 405, Issue 2, Pages 857-869

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16511.x

Keywords

stars: formation; galaxies: stellar content; galaxies: structure

Funding

  1. STFC
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H00243X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper we derive ages and masses for 276 clusters in the merger galaxy NGC 3256. This was achieved by taking accurate photometry in four wavebands from archival Hubble Space Telescope images. Photometric measurements are compared to synthetic stellar population (SSP) models to find the most probable age, mass and extinction. The cluster population of NGC 3256 reveals an increase in the star formation rate (SFR) over the last 100 Myr and the initial cluster mass function (ICMF) is best described by a power-law relation with slope alpha = 1.85 +/- 0.12. Using the observed cluster population for NGC 3256 we calculate the implied mass of clusters younger than 10-Myr old, and convert this to a cluster formation rate over the last 10 Myr. Comparison of this value with the SFR indicates the fraction of stars found within bound clusters after the embedded phase of cluster formation, Gamma, is 22.9 +/- 7.3(9.8) per cent for NGC 3256. We carried out an in-depth analysis into the errors associated with such calculations showing that errors introduced by the SSP fitting must be taken into account and an unconstrained metallicity adds to these uncertainties. Observational biases should also be considered. Using published cluster population data sets we calculate Gamma for six other galaxies and examine how Gamma varies with environment. We show that Gamma increases with the SFR density and can be described as a power-law type relation of the form Gamma (per cent) = (29.0 +/- 6.0) Sigma 0.24 +/- 0.04(SFR) (M (circle dot) yr-1 kpc-2).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available