4.7 Review

Hierarchical structures in the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 403, Issue 2, Pages 996-1008

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16177.x

Keywords

Magellanic Clouds

Funding

  1. CNPq (Brazil)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the degree of spatial correlation among extended structures in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) and Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC). To this purpose, we work with subsamples characterized by different properties such as age and size, taken from the updated catalogue of Bica et al. or gathered in the present work. The structures are classified as star clusters or non-clusters (basically, nebular complexes and their stellar associations). The radius distribution functions follow power laws (dN/dR proportional to R-alpha) with slopes and maximum radius (R-max) that depend on object class (and age). Non-clusters are characterized by alpha approximate to 1.9 and R-max less than or similar to 472 pc, while young clusters (age less than or similar to 10 Myr) have alpha approximate to 3.6 and R-max less than or similar to 15 pc and old ones (age greater than or similar to 600 Myr) have alpha approximate to 2.5 and R-max less than or similar to 40 pc. Young clusters present a high degree of spatial self-correlation and, especially, correlate with star-forming structures, which does not occur with the old ones. This is consistent with the old clusters having been heavily mixed up, since their ages correspond to several LMC and SMC crossing times. On the other hand, with ages corresponding to fractions of the respective crossing times, the young clusters still trace most of their birthplace structural pattern. Also, small clusters (R < 10 pc), as well as small non-clusters (R < 100 pc), are spatially self-correlated, while their large counterparts of both classes are not. The above results are consistent with a hierarchical star formation scenario for the LMC and SMC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available