4.7 Article

Galaxy and Mass Assembly: FUV, NUV, ugrizYJHK Petrosian, Kron and Sersic photometry

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 412, Issue 2, Pages 765-799

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17950.x

Keywords

methods: data analysis; methods: observational; techniques: image processing; techniques: photometric; surveys; galaxies: fundamental parameters

Funding

  1. STFC
  2. Australian Research Council [DP0557850]
  3. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  4. National Science Foundation
  5. US Department of Energy
  6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  7. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  8. Max Planck Society
  9. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  10. American Museum of Natural History
  11. Astrophysical Institute Potsdam
  12. University of Basel
  13. University of Cambridge
  14. Case Western Reserve University
  15. University of Chicago
  16. Drexel University
  17. Fermilab
  18. Institute for Advanced Study
  19. Japan Participation Group
  20. Johns Hopkins University
  21. Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics
  22. Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology
  23. Korean Scientist Group
  24. Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST)
  25. Los Alamos National Laboratory
  26. Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA)
  27. Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA)
  28. New Mexico State University
  29. Ohio State University
  30. University of Pittsburgh
  31. University of Portsmouth
  32. Princeton University
  33. United States Naval Observatory
  34. University of Washington
  35. Australian Research Council [DP0557850] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
  36. STFC [ST/H007156/1, ST/H00131X/1, ST/H00047X/1, ST/H008578/1, ST/G001995/1, ST/F002300/1, ST/H004211/1, ST/H002391/1, ST/J002291/1, PP/E001149/1, ST/G001987/1, ST/H000496/1, ST/H008519/1, ST/F002289/1, ST/G001979/1, ST/I003088/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  37. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F002289/1, ST/H00131X/1, ST/F002300/1, PP/E001149/1, ST/G001995/1, ST/H008578/1, ST/G001979/1, ST/H007156/1, ST/H002391/1, ST/H004211/1, ST/H00047X/1, ST/H000496/1, ST/H008519/1, ST/G001987/1, ST/I003088/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to generate credible 0.1-2 mu m spectral energy distributions, the Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA) project requires many gigabytes of imaging data from a number of instruments to be reprocessed into a standard format. In this paper, we discuss the software infrastructure we use, and create self-consistent ugrizYJHK photometry for all sources within the GAMA sample. Using UKIDSS and SDSS archive data, we outline the pre-processing necessary to standardize all images to a common zero-point, the steps taken to correct for the seeing bias across the data set and the creation of gigapixel-scale mosaics of the three 4 x 12 deg2 GAMA regions in each filter. From these mosaics, we extract source catalogues for the GAMA regions using elliptical Kron and Petrosian matched apertures. We also calculate Sersic magnitudes for all galaxies within the GAMA sample using sigma, a galaxy component modelling wrapper for galfit 3. We compare the resultant photometry directly and also calculate the r-band galaxy luminosity function for all photometric data sets to highlight the uncertainty introduced by the photometric method. We find that (1) changing the object detection threshold has a minor effect on the best-fitting Schechter parameters of the overall population (M* +/- 0.055 mag, alpha +/- 0.014, phi* +/- 0.0005 h3 Mpc-3); (2) there is an offset between data sets that use Kron or Petrosian photometry, regardless of the filter; (3) the decision to use circular or elliptical apertures causes an offset in M* of 0.20 mag; (4) the best-fitting Schechter parameters from total-magnitude photometric systems (such as SDSS modelmag or Sersic magnitudes) have a steeper faint-end slope than photometric systems based upon Kron or Petrosian measurements; and (5) our Universe's total luminosity density, when calculated using Kron or Petrosian r-band photometry, is underestimated by at least 15 per cent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available