4.7 Article

Is the plateau state in GRS 1915+105 equivalent to canonical hard states?

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 409, Issue 2, Pages 763-776

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17339.x

Keywords

accretion, accretion discs; black hole physics; radiation mechanisms: general; galaxies: active; galaxies: jets; X-rays: binaries

Funding

  1. NASA
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  3. European Community [FP7/2007-2013, ITN 215212]
  4. Spanish Ministry [AYA 2009-14000-C03-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

GRS 1915+105 is a very peculiar black hole binary that exhibits accretion-related states that are not observed in any other stellar-mass black hole system. One of these states, however referred to as the plateau state - may be related to the canonical hard state of black hole X-ray binaries. Both the plateau and hard state are associated with steady, relatively lower X-ray emission and flat/inverted radio emission, that is sometimes resolved into compact, self-absorbed jets. However, while generally black hole binaries quench their jets when the luminosity becomes too high, GRS 1915+105 seems to sustain them despite the fact that it accretes at near- or super-Eddington rates. In order to investigate the relationship between the plateau and the hard state, we fit two multiwavelength observations using a steady-state outflow-dominated model, developed for hard-state black hole binaries. The data sets consist of quasi-simultaneous observations in radio, near- infrared and X-ray bands. Interestingly, we find both significant differences between the two plateau states, as well as between the best-fitting model parameters and those representative of the hard state. We discuss our interpretation of these results, and the possible implications for GRS 1915+105's relationship to canonical black hole candidates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available