4.7 Article

The relation between halo shape, velocity dispersion and formation time

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 407, Issue 1, Pages 581-589

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16935.x

Keywords

methods: numerical; galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: haloes; dark matter

Funding

  1. European Commission through its funding of the Latin-American European Network for Astrophysics and Cosmology (LENAC)
  2. Consejo de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas de la Republica Argentina (CONICET)
  3. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnica de la Universidad Nacional de Cordoba (SeCyT)
  4. MCyT [FPA2006-01105, AYA2006-15492-C03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We use dark matter haloes identified in the MareNostrum Universex and galaxy groups identified in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 (SDSS DR7) galaxy catalogue to study the relation between halo shape and halo dynamics, parametrizing the mass of the systems. A strong shape-dynamics correlation, independent of mass, is present in the simulation data, which we find to be due to different halo-formation times. Early formation-time haloes are, at the present epoch, more spherical and have higher velocity dispersions than late formation-time haloes. The halo shape-dynamics correlation survives the projection into two dimensions (i.e. between projected shape and 1D velocity dispersion), albeit weaker. A similar shape-dynamics correlation, independent of mass, is also found in the SDSS DR7 groups of galaxies, and in order to investigate its cause we have tested and used, as a proxy of the group formation time, a concentration parameter. We have found, as in the case of the simulated haloes, that less concentrated groups, corresponding to late formation times, have lower velocity dispersions and higher elongations than groups with higher values of concentration, corresponding to early formation times.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available