4.7 Article

The fragmentation of expanding shells - II. Thickness matters

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 407, Issue 3, Pages 1963-1971

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17045.x

Keywords

hydrodynamics; instabilities; stars: formation; stars: winds; outflows; HII regions; ISM: structure

Funding

  1. DOE
  2. European Community [MEIF-CT-2006-039802]
  3. European Commission [MRTN-CT-2006-035890]
  4. Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic [AV0Z10030501]
  5. Centre for Theoretical Astrophysics of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [LC06014]
  6. STFC [PP/E000967/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study analytically the development of gravitational instability in an expanding shell having finite thickness. We consider three models for the radial density profile of the shell: (i) an analytic uniform-density model, (ii) a semi-analytic model obtained by numerical solution of the hydrostatic equilibrium equation and (iii) a 3D hydrodynamic simulation. We show that all three profiles are in close agreement, and this allows us to use the first model to describe fragments in the radial direction of the shell. We then use non-linear equations describing the time-evolution of a uniform oblate spheroid to derive the growth rates of shell fragments having different sizes. This yields a dispersion relation which depends on the shell thickness, and hence on the pressure confining the shell. We compare this dispersion relation with the dispersion relation obtained using the standard thin-shell analysis, and show that, if the confining pressure is low, only large fragments are unstable. On the other hand, if the confining pressure is high, fragments smaller than predicted by the thin-shell analysis become unstable. Finally, we compare the new dispersion relation with the results of 3D hydrodynamic simulations, and show that the two are in good agreement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available