4.7 Article

The ratio of luminous to faint red-sequence galaxies in X-ray and optically selected low-redshift clusters

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 403, Issue 3, Pages 1274-1282

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16220.x

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: photometry; large-scale structure of Universe

Funding

  1. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. US Department of Energy
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  5. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  6. Max Planck Society
  7. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  8. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H002391/1, PP/E001149/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. STFC [ST/H002391/1, PP/E001149/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the ratio of luminous to faint red-sequence galaxies in both optically and X-ray selected galaxy clusters in the poorly studied redshift range 0.05 < z < 0.19. The X-ray-selected sample consists of 112 clusters based on the ROSAT All-Sky Survey, while the optical sample consists of 266 clusters from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Our results are consistent with the presence of a trend in luminous-to-faint ratio with redshift, confirming that downsizing is continuous from high to low redshift. After correcting for the variations with redshift using a partial Spearman analysis, we find no significant relationship between luminous-to-faint ratio and X-ray luminosity of the host cluster sample, in contrast to recent suggestions. Finally, we investigate the stacked colour-magnitude relations of these samples, finding no significant differences between the slopes for optically and X-ray selected clusters. The colour-magnitude slopes are consistent with the values obtained in similar studies, but not with predictions of theoretical models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available